KYC · SANCTIONS · AML · TRADE FINANCE
Your screening tool checks a list. TrueParty knows who you're dealing with.
A list match is the surface. Beneath it sit the owners, the history and the paperwork, and that is where exposure hides. TrueParty reads every layer and cites what it finds.
19M+
company, sanctions & PEP records held
15.2M
ownership & control edges
10
company registers, held or queried live
0%
false merges on the adversarial test set · how we measure
2011
point-in-time coverage
WHAT YOU CAN DEPLOY
Three ways in, one investigation engine.
Start with the surface your team works in. Each runs on the same resolved entity graph, so findings carry across without re-keying.
TRUEPARTY SCREEN
Know who you're onboarding
Sanctions, PEP, export-control and connected-party screening, as the lists stand today or on the transaction date.
- OFAC, UN, UK, EU and national lists in one pass
- Point-in-time history back to 2011
- Ownership and control, with sanctioned owners surfaced
- Every hit reasoned; a name-only "possible" goes to review
TRUEPARTY INVESTIGATE
Build the case, not just the alert
Resolve the entity, walk the network, score the risk and produce a cited report an analyst can defend.
- Fine-tuned entity resolution that abstains when unsure
- Beneficial-ownership graph across sources and time
- Explainable risk score with tunable weights
- Cited report and an evidence-grounded copilot
TRUEPARTY TRADE
Screen the paper and the ship
Bill-of-lading triage, documentary forensics, vessel due diligence and shipment-route verification in one pass.
- A vision model reads the B/L; every party and the cargo screened
- Back-dated bills caught against real port-call records
- Vessel sanctioned-hull, owner and behaviour checks
- Transshipment legs verified against actual movements
Investigate inside the workflow you already use
A case in your CRM or case tool can call TrueParty machine-to-machine: pass the party, vessel, date and documents, and the cited findings, evidence and coverage come back into the case. The analyst keeps the final disposition, and both systems keep a correlated audit trail.
01 · YOUR SYSTEM
Case opened in your CRM or case tool
→
02 · TRUEPARTY
Party, vessel, date and documents investigated
→
03 · BACK TO THE CASE
Cited findings, evidence and coverage returned
→
04 · YOUR ANALYST
Reviews and records the final disposition
Live today via scoped service-account API keys · deeper embedding in SimpleWorks CRM on the roadmap · discuss an integration
START HERE
Use it when you need to answer:
TrueParty moves teams from list-based screening to evidence-based counterparty investigation. The questions it exists for:
Who is really behind this company?
Was this party or vessel sanctioned on the transaction date?
Are these counterparties secretly connected?
Does this Bill of Lading carry trade-finance red flags?
Did the goods really travel the route the documents claim?
Will this due-diligence note stand up in front of a committee or regulator?
BUILT FOR:
Trade finance teams
Sanctions & AML analysts
KYC / onboarding teams
Correspondent banking
Financial-crime investigators
Second-line compliance review
HOW IT WORKS
One graph. Every lens.
Most tooling is a search box over a list. TrueParty resolves every source into one entity graph, and everything else is a lens that interrogates it.
SOURCES
Sanctions · PEP · export control · registries · AIS · documents
Commodity data anyone can assemble.
→
THE GATE
A fine-tuned matcher decides what's the same entity
0% false-merge on the adversarial test set. Ambiguity goes to a human, never auto-confirmed.
→
THE GRAPH
Who owns and controls whom, across sources and time
Every new source compounds; nothing silos.
→
THE LENSES
Screening · risk score · cited AI report · copilot
Ten explainable dimensions, one defensible answer.
The matcher is what makes the graph safe to build on. The graph is how every new source compounds.
The core lenses for counterparty investigation.
§ CAPABILITIES01
Screening
OFAC, UN, UK, EU + six national lists, 600k PEPs and US export control in one pass. Every hit carries a reason and a confidence; a name-only "possible" goes to review, never auto-confirmed.
02
Ownership network
Multi-hop sweep for sanctioned or PEP beneficial owners anywhere in the structure: the escalation hiding one hop behind a clean façade. Nominee hubs excluded, every edge cited. Ownership coverage varies by jurisdiction and source availability, and the platform says so on every result rather than implying completeness.
03
Related parties
Are these counterparties secretly connected? The graph returns the path itself, company → controller → sibling company: typed, cited and inspectable.
04
Explainable risk score
Ten dimensions roll into a 0–100 score, a substantive risk level (low to high) and a recommended review path (standard to escalate). Coverage limitations are stated separately: a data gap is never dressed up as risk, and risk is never hidden behind one. Every weight is yours to tune; decisive factors can never be averaged away.
05
Cited AI report
A graded recommendation where every claim cites a real evidence id: no hallucinated specifics, reproducible from the exact evidence it was written on. Committee-ready PDF in minutes.
06
Investigation copilot
Interrogate any result in plain English: "why this risk band?", "who are the owners?". Grounded in the on-screen evidence; says "not in the evidence" rather than speculating.
POINT-IN-TIME SCREENING
"Clean today" doesn't answer
"were you dealing with a sanctioned party in March 2015?"
Disputes, chargebacks and regulator questions are always about a past transaction. One search, a name or a hull number plus a date, returns who was listed, since when, with what evidence, typically in under a second.
M/T SILVER CLOUD → renamed ARGO I · keyed by hull IMOOFAC (US)
2011
listed by 17-Jul-2012 · removed between 22-Oct-2015 and 02-Apr-2016
re-listed by 24-Aug-2019
still listed today
two listing spells on one hull, each with its own evidence · precision shown, never implied: a window is never narrowed to a day without an official notice
"No data" is never "clear"
Before a list's history begins, the platform states the limit of its knowledge instead of implying a clean pass.
Ships keyed by hull
An IMO search finds a vessel under every name it has sailed: an exact hull match, not a name similarity.
Provenance per claim
Archived list copy, official change notice, or daily check: every historical claim names its evidence class.
HISTORY FROM:
OFAC · 2011
SECO · 2014
UN · 2017
US denied-party lists · 2020
EU · 2020
Canada · 2021
Australia · 2021
UK · 2023
TRADE FINANCE & MARITIME
The fraud hides in the document and the ship. Screen both in one pass.
Bill of Lading triage
·A vision model reads the scan; every party is screened, the cargo dual-use-checked, the vessel screened by IMO.
·Classic fraud patterns flagged: route mismatches, shared contacts across "different" parties, invalid IMO check-digits, double-financing duplicates.
·A dated document is also screened against the lists as they stood on the shipment date, in the committee PDF.
·Explosives-precursor screening catches the "agricultural use only" diversion sanctions checks pass.
·Where the carrier is connected, the bill is checked against the carrier's own live records: a matching record corroborates the declared route, an unknown bill number is a high-severity flag.
·Also callable machine-to-machine: structured fields in, the full cited verdict out, straight into your CRM or case system.
Documentary forensics
·The paper itself is checked: container check digits (ISO 6346), the carrier's own B/L number format, weights no real container can carry.
·A bill dated before the vessel's recorded arrival at the load port is flagged as back-dated: the letter-of-credit deadline trick, caught against real port-call records.
·House-bill issuers verified against the official US register of ~10,000 licensed NVOCCs and freight forwarders.
·Drafts, pro-formas, forwarder receipts and sea waybills are named for what they are: paper that evidences no shipment.
·A presentment memory recalls every document seen before; the same bill re-presented with altered details flags immediately.
Vessel due diligence
·An IMO, or just a vessel name resolved via live AIS: sanctioned-hull check, registered and beneficial owners and the manager screened, flag, live position and track.
·Behavioural analysis: route consistency against the stated load port, unexplained draught changes, ship-to-ship transfer candidates, flag-hopping and ownership churn.
·Port calls anchor the checks to actual berth visits; high-risk terminals escalate.
·Port-state-control inspection and detention history surfaces vessels with a physical-inspection record.
·Declared transshipment chains verified leg by leg against the vessels' actual recorded movements.
·Committee-ready PDF, same house style as the company report.
TRUST & ACCURACY
Built to never overstate.
Accuracy is measured, not assumed, and every guard exists because a real failure once demanded it, pinned by a named regression test.
0% false-merge
Held against an adversarial stress set of look-alike and near-miss pairs, re-run on every matcher change. A supplied identifier is decisive; a conflicting one clears a look-alike. How we measure it →
Abstain to review
Common names, bare aliases and thin queries defer to a human analyst: never auto-confirmed, never auto-dismissed.
Fail closed
A stale or missing required list flags screening non-authoritative, never a silent clean pass.
Cite by id
Every report claim checks back to a real evidence id, and the exact evidence pack is stored with the report.
Screening Muhammad Iqbal, DOB 1964 touches a record whose alias list contains the bare word "Muhammad" and whose birth year agrees. TrueParty refuses to call that a hit: one common name plus a year shared by millions is namesake arithmetic, not identity. It holds the case for review, with that reasoning stated.
DATA COVERAGE
The sources, and how fresh they are.
Coverage snapshot, last reviewed 24 July 2026, figures taken from the live system on that date. Figures move as the sources do.
DATACOVERSREFRESH
SanctionsOFAC · UN · UK · EU + six national lists, consolidated with per-list provenance3× daily
Export controlUS Consolidated Screening List: BIS, State and Treasury denied partiesdaily
WatchlistsBeyond sanctions, as review-grade context, never a sanctions verdict: World Bank debarment (~1,500) · UFLPA forced-labour · UK / US / India terrorism proscription lists · UANI vessel list (NGO)daily
PEP~600k politically-exposed persons with FATF tiers, offices and family linksdaily
Adverse mediaLive web sweep over a 5-year look-back at investigation time; an AI reader adjudicates every mention against the resolved entity, with the citation kept. Adjudication can only lower a mention's severity, never raise it: escalation always traces to the source itselflive
Company registersTen registers across nine jurisdictions. Held locally: UK Companies House (~5.7M) · India MCA (~3.7M) · Florida Sunbiz (~4.1M active) · Singapore ACRA (~2.1M). Queried live: New York DOS · Hong Kong CR · Norway Enhetsregisteret · France Annuaire des Entreprises · Australia ABN Lookup · Switzerland Zefix. Plus GLEIF/LEI (~3.1M global) · UK FCA register · SEC EDGARlive / daily
Ownership~15.2M ownership and control edges: UK PSC control + GLEIF Level-2 parents + UK overseas-entity beneficial owners, across ~7.6M controllers. Depth varies by jurisdiction; every network states its coverageweekly
Vessels & trade~2,550 sanctioned hulls by IMO, consolidated from the official lists with per-source provenance · AIS position and track · port calls and port line-ups · PSC inspection history · dual-use and prohibition annexesdaily / live
History~96,000 listing intervals and 9,700 recovered delistings across 23 sources, to Jan 2011accrues daily
The platform runs fully on the open sources alone. Commercial feeds are additive and self-disable when their key is unset: the product degrades gracefully, never breaks.
DEPLOYMENT
Runs inside your environment.
One origin, on-prem or private cloud. The core investigation, resolution, locally held screening data, ownership analysis and the report, can run with nothing leaving your environment. Live enrichment lanes are configured separately, and named clearly when they are off.
No vendor lock-in
A provider-neutral AI layer: leading commercial models, self-hosted models, or fully offline deterministic engines.
Offline-capable core
Entity resolution, locally held screening data, historical screening, ownership analysis and deterministic reporting run without external connectivity. Live enrichment lanes are clearly flagged when unavailable.
Governed access
Role-based login with per-feature permissions, optional two-factor, and an interaction ledger of who screened whom, when.
Built for data-protection mandates
An architecture designed to support GDPR compliance: reproducible reports, documented data-protection posture, per-source licensing transparency in-product.
Plugs into your CRM
Scoped service-account API keys and machine-to-machine endpoints return the same cited verdicts inside your existing case workflow, with a full integration guide in-product.
UK data residency
A UK-resident hosting option for data-sovereignty mandates, with a documented deployment runbook.
12 yrs
in the customer-experience & AI industry
100+
enterprise implementations delivered
150+
certified domain experts
15
countries with financial-services clients
TrueParty is a product of SimpleWorks, an enterprise software firm delivering customer-experience and AI systems to financial institutions worldwide, with ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 9001:2015 certified delivery. Security documentation and a completed due-diligence questionnaire pack are available on request.
Stop searching lists.
Start investigating counterparties.
Every capability ships with one-click live examples: see a full investigation on real data in your first session.
Or write to us directly: sales@trueparty.ai